Document Actions
Supreme court in India's ruling on creamy layer for backward classes
In a strong ruling on the current reservation crisis / issue, the Supreme court in India has ordered the government of India to keep the "creamy" layer of the backward classes out of reservations
It's a step in the right direction. At least that's what I think. For a long time now, there was a debate that the reservations are being wasted on and abused by the affluent and well to do families from the backward classes in India with no solution in sight. I have some interaction with those experiences back in the days when I was in school / college. We always used to wonder how come people from backward classes who were richer than us benefitting from the reservations like no fees, preferred admission etc.
Now the Supreme court has made it official what was the sentiment in the so called upper class in India. People in the creamy layer of the backward classes shall be excluded from reservations. The ruling also says that while providing reservation for promotion in government jobs the government has to justify that the backward classes are not adequately represented and that the administrative effeciencies are not impelled.
However, the supreme court has not defined what the creamy layer is and is left to the government to define and implement it. Neither has the Supreme Court set any dates as to the implementation. So what does this mean to common people like us? In the short run. Nothing. The reservations are still going to be at the 50% level however whenever the goverment chooses to implement this order the reservations will start bearing some meaning and people who are really in the need of the ladder would get it and people who don't need it but abuse it just because they are of backward caste by birth will (should) not get it.
It is now upto us citizens that the government implements this order and that it is done so in a fair manner. What can we do? We can pressurise our local representatives, MLAs and MPs to take action on them if they want to be re-elected and want to hold office. There has to be some accountability in these things and it won't come unless common people start doing uncommon things like asking for accountability.



Are you in touch with reality?
While I agree with the overall tone of the article, I found this part quite funny.
>What can we do? We can pressurise our local representatives, >MLAs and MPs to take action on them if they want to be >re-elected and want to hold office.
Huh? When was the last time you did that?